AI Pregnant Filter

It works, but you lose the best evidence. A fitted knit or a t-shirt shows the shape through tension in the fabric; an oversized jumper hides it, so the result relies entirely on the silhouette and reads weaker. If you have a choice of source photos, pick the fitted one.

It responds to stages rather than dates — early, showing, late, twins — because that is what a photograph can actually convey. Nobody can tell twenty-six weeks from twenty-eight in a picture, and asking for a precise week gets you the model's average of that whole range anyway.

No. The edit is confined to the torso, the clothing over it and the stance that carries it. Face, expression, hairstyle, skin and everything behind you are supposed to come through untouched, and a result that changes your face is a failed run worth rerunning.

Yes — say which person the change applies to and what the other one is doing, such as resting a hand on the bump. Naming both roles keeps the edit from spreading to the wrong body, which is the usual failure on two-person sources.

Only with their agreement. Making an image of a real person that implies something untrue about their body is the kind of thing that lands badly however it was meant, and the content policy covers what you generate here. On yourself, or with the person in the photo asking for it, none of that applies.

Usually the source was cropped just below the chest, so the model had very little torso to work with and put the curve where the frame allowed. Use a photo that includes the whole torso down to the hips and it lands where it should.

The estimate is shown before you generate and changes with the resolution you choose, so nothing is a surprise afterwards. Failed runs return to your balance unless they broke the content policy, and a new account has enough to try a couple of stages.