EARLY BLACK FRIDAY 2× credits on every new plan — a whole extra year of credits on yearly. Ends December 1.

AI Cross Stitch Pattern Generator

Turn the photo you love into a keepsake you will be proud to stitch, gift and hang — rebuilt as honest squares, real thread colour and handmade texture.

Worked pieces

What the grid looks like when it is right

Two finished pieces where the square structure is doing the work. Look at the edges of the shapes first — that is where a real chart shows its stepped, blocky boundary and a filtered photo shows a smooth curve. See the stepped, block-by-block look your photo can become — then chart your own piece.

A tulip: few colours, obvious steps
Simple

A tulip: few colours, obvious steps

Five or six greens and reds, and every leaf edge stepping square by square rather than curving. This is the shape a chart takes when the palette is honest about what thread can do.

Chart something simple
A dragon: shading built only from whole stitches
Detailed

A dragon: shading built only from whole stitches

More colours, but the shading is still assembled from complete squares rather than blended. That constraint is what keeps it stitchable at a larger count.

Try something detailed
Craft tool

What makes a chart workable rather than pretty

The most faithful way to see a photo as cross stitch: every colour, edge and texture obeys the arithmetic of a real counted grid.

Image tool

A counted design of this kind is a grid where each cell holds exactly one thread colour. That sounds trivial and it is where almost every conversion fails: photographs contain smooth gradients, and a gradient rendered onto a grid produces a different colour in every adjacent square, which is unstitchable in practice and unreadable as a chart.

So the useful conversion does two things at once — it quantises the image to a grid at a stitch count you can actually work, and it collapses the palette to a countable number of threads, accepting flat areas where the photo had subtle shading. What comes back is the finished piece with a visible grid and whole-square colour structure, ready to guide a stitcher square by square, with every shape resolved at the scale real cloth can hold.

Creative engine

How a chart is made

Upload a photo, say how many threads and how fine the cloth, then read the colours off the result.

One photo
Whole-square design
You set the count
Pick a subject with big shapes

Pick a subject with big shapes

A flower, an animal, a letter, a simple silhouette. Faces at small counts turn to mush for the same reason they do on real cloth — there are not enough squares to hold the detail.

Say how many threads you want

Say how many threads you want

"Twelve colours" produces something crisp and old-fashioned. "Forty colours" produces something closer to the photo and much harder to stitch. The number is the single biggest lever you have.

How to use

Three decisions, and they are all about constraint

The default prompt carries the grid rules. These are the numbers only you can choose.

Choose a subject with large shapes
1
Subject

Choose a subject with large shapes

Flowers, animals, letters, silhouettes. Big, bold shapes are what make the finished grid feel unmistakably yours.

Name your thread count
2
Palette

Name your thread count

Twelve colours for something crisp and traditional, thirty for something closer to the photograph. Fewer threads is almost always the better-looking answer.

Say what cloth it sits on
3
Cloth

Say what cloth it sits on

Choose a finer cloth to hold faces and small details, then name the colour: white aida, natural linen, black even-weave. It shows through every gap and changes the whole piece in a single phrase.

Who it's for

Who charts a photo

Four reasons, and only one of them ends with a needle.

A stitcher planning a personal piece

A stitcher planning a personal piece

Seeing the subject as squares before buying thread tells you whether it will work at all. Your first chart needs no sign-up, which beats finding out forty hours in.

Anyone who wants the look without the hours

Anyone who wants the look without the hours

The finished-piece image is its own object — a print, a card, a phone background. Plenty of people want the aesthetic and have no intention of stitching anything.

Makers testing a design before committing

Makers testing a design before committing

Try the same subject at three palette sizes and see where it stops reading. That comparison is hard to do in your head and instant here.

Someone building a gift

A pet, a house, a wedding date. The subject matters more than the technique, and the stepped grid is what makes it read as handmade rather than printed. The same instinct drives free-form embroidery, which trades the grid for stitch direction.

Answers

Chart conversion FAQ

What people ask before they buy thread.

No. What you get is an image of the finished piece with the grid and the whole-square structure visible, which is enough to read colours and count squares from. A symbol chart with DMC numbers is a different kind of file, and this does not produce one.

Twelve to twenty for something that looks like traditional needlework and is realistic to stitch. Beyond about forty you are asking for a photograph rendered on a grid — it will look impressive on screen and be miserable to work from.

Because there were not enough squares to hold it. Faces need a high count to survive, and at low counts the features land inside single squares and vanish. Ask for a finer cloth, or pick a subject with bigger shapes.

Yes, and it changes more than you would expect. The cloth shows through every gap between stitches, so a design on black even-weave reads completely differently from the same design on white aida.

The grid logic is similar, which is why pixel art conversion shares some of the same thinking, but the constraints are not: this craft has a physical thread palette, a visible cloth weave between cells, and the X of each stitch as texture. Pixels have none of those.

Only in your own history, so you can rerun the same subject at a different thread count. It travels over HTTPS, is never used to advertise, and deleting a chart removes the source photo with it.

One purchase, and everything you make here is yours to post

Any plan or pack — even a $19.90 one — unlocks a clean copy of every image you have made here, starts each new run instantly, and refunds one that fails.

50% OFFYour first purchase is half price

Starter

$8.33/month
$100/year billed yearly
  • 23,100 Credits Per Year · 1,925/mo
  • Up to 2,310 videos
  • Up to 4,620 images
  • No Queue, Instant Start
  • HD, Watermark-Free Downloads
  • Commercial Use License
20% OFF - Save $70.8

Creator

$24.0/month
$288/year billed yearly
  • 75,000 Credits Per Year · 6,250/mo
  • Up to 7,500 videos
  • Up to 15,000 images
  • No Queue, Instant Start
  • HD, Watermark-Free Downloads
  • Commercial Use License
40% OFF

Pro

$30.0/month
$360/year billed yearly
  • 94,500 Credits Per Year · 7,875/mo
  • Up to 9,450 videos
  • Up to 18,900 images
  • No Queue, Instant Start
  • HD, Watermark-Free Downloads
  • Commercial Use License

Free plan

  • Get 100 credits a week with check-ins
  • 20 Free Credits with login
  • Up to 2 videos
  • Up to 4 images
  • No Card, No Account
  • Free Images And 4s Videos When Signed In
  • Free Engine Every Day

Pay safely and securely with

Payments are processed by Stripe over an encrypted checkout. Your card details are handled by Stripe and are never stored by Kavel.

See your photo as squares

Pick a subject with big shapes, name a thread count, and turn the photo that matters to you into a stepped stitch chart worth making your own.